Roommate Collaborative Strategy

I would first determine her long-term goals and figure out what she was attempting to accomplish while living here. For the sake of the assignment I will assume her goals are to live together until graduation and be on time with her utility payment. You must understand what the root problem at hand is so we can effectively, and explicitly address it. Our common goal would be to live together as friends and maintain a hassle free relationship with one another and the leasing office. It is important to establish common goals that are void of “blame”. You should steer clear of blaming the person you’re collaborating with as to not insult them or the relationship. I understand that her issue stems from financial downfalls and  poor hygiene practices. I can assume these are issues that deeply affect her and she needs support and motivation to do feel and do better. She has expressed an interest in working on these issues and maintaining our relationship, so next we’ll find a course of action that will benefit the both of us. Alternative/Selected solutions should not be beneficial to just one person. I would certainly look to use the “expand the pie” strategy and help my roommate by providing her with an opportunity to make money that I could. I would help her apply for jobs, update her resume, prepare for interviews, sell old clothing, anything that could her her with her finances. My benefit would be to have the utilities paid off on time and hers would be to help her cover her debts better. After selecting a solution to address the finances, we would next select a solution to the dirty dish issue. Most likely, I would offer to buy pods for the dishwasher as long as she would simply agree to stock, and run the machine. I think this makes it simple for the two of us and it would be no hassle for me. I think this would these two solutions would be enough to solve our problems so I would run it by her once more to make sure everything works for her, and addresses her concerns. After a week or two I would check in with her to ensure everything is still running smoothly and she is benefiting from our negotiation.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Negotiating With a Liar is a Bad Idea

According to psychologists, lying is the act of being deceptive in order to mask a true fact, intention, or feeling, amongst other things. Common law fraud requires five elements: false representation of a material fact, knowledge of this falsity, intent to deceive someone using this false representation, justified reliance by the injured party, and damage or injury done to the innocent party. Lying in a negotiation is a bad idea mainly because a good negotiator will look to detect deception and expose liars. This could derail any future endeavors , and the relationship with the party in which you’re negotiating with. Also, a false statement can possibly be ruled a legally binding statement with the right combination of false claims. This can be quite costly, especially if a judge or jury believe you’ve acted immorally and greatly harmed an innocent party. The simplest reason is, it’s wrong and usually illegal. Lying can become a frequent, subconscious action; it should be curbed as t...
Read more

Tit for Tat Podcast

I believe the entire podcast provided meaningful historical insight, especially how an elementary level computer, simple thought experiment, and a few great minds could come together and create a set of strategies that could be applied on a global scale. I enjoyed the linkage between the  tactics of the players of the game and tactics of soldiers at war. The players of the game were initially laid out to help listeners better understand the global application. For example “ Tester” tests limits to see how much deflecting they can get away with ,when it gets screwed over a lot it stops cooperating all together. “Jesus” always does good, “Lucifer” always does bad. They tied this a historical event, in which one group of soldiers unintentionally did an act of good and encouraged their opposition to do the same thing; this resulted in a short truce and the realization that moral cooperation exist. Knowing this encourages me to assume others have an underlying intention to do what’s rig...
Read more
Electronically-mediated communication, for me had a few pros and even less cons. We chose to communicate via FaceTime and the main pro was the convenience of communicating from my bedroom. This is possibly the only context in which a “professional” meeting is conducted from a bedroom. Another pro was still being able to see the person I was negotiating with. I could see when she was contemplating my offers, unsure wether to take them, or happy to accept them. This made it less of a guessing game when it came to the concessions I could offer her. Yet another pro was being able to communicate in real time. Not having to wait for an email back was also convenient, everything was instantaneous for the most part. One con was diminished privacy. Mainly on my side, I was sure my roommates could hear me negotiating, one even came to very quietly and politely what I was talking about. I explained to her afterwards our negotiation exercises. Still, it was very easy for anyone to just walk in the...
Read more